New Divorce Law – In 2025, South Africa is poised for transformative reforms in divorce and family law. Central to this change is the General Laws (Family Matters) Amendment Bill, 2025, introduced by Justice Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi. This proposed legislation builds on a landmark Constitutional Court ruling from October 10, 2023, which found that existing divorce rules—which excluded certain types of marriages from asset‑redistribution rights—were unconstitutional. The 2025 amendments seek to modernize the Divorce Act, the Matrimonial Property Act, and the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act to promote fairness, protect vulnerable spouses, and broaden legal recognition of all marriages (including Muslim and customary marriages).
Background: Why Change Was Needed
Under current law—specifically the Divorce Act 70 of 1979—redistribution orders are permitted only in marriages that pre‑date 1 November 1984 (before accrual was introduced), or where accrual is included in an antenuptial contract. Couples married out of community of property without accrual after that date have no claim to each other’s estate, even if one spouse stayed home or supported the other to build wealth. This gap disproportionately harmed homemakers and economically vulnerable spouses. The Constitutional Court held that Section 7(3) of the Divorce Act violated equality rights by denying redistribution to those spouses, and ordered Parliament to remedy the defect.
Key Reforms in the 2025 Bill
According to legal commentary published in June 2025, the proposed Bill introduces these critical reforms:
- Extended Redistribution Powers – Courts can now order redistribution of assets in—
• Pre‑1984 marriages ending in divorce or death, restoring earlier relief mechanisms
• Post‑1984 marriages without accrual when fairness demands it, even if an antenuptial contract excluded accrual - Override of Antenuptial Contract Effects – While couples can still sign contracts excluding accrual, that choice is no longer absolute. Courts may override strict separation terms if enforcing them would lead to unjust outcomes (e.g. one spouse walks away with significant assets while the other contributed indirectly)
- Matrimonial Property Act Amendments – Explicitly empowers courts to redistribute assets when a marriage without accrual ends via death as well as divorce
- Mediation Act Updates – The Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act (1987) will be updated to clarify the role and authority of the Family Advocate’s Office in mediation and ensure mediation is more consistently applied before litigation begins
Who Benefits Most?
These changes are particularly significant for:
- Couples where one spouse didn’t earn income but contributed through home life, childcare, or supporting business activities.
- Older marriages (pre‑1984) that previously lacked flexible remedy options on death or divorce.
- Post‑1984 marriages that explicitly excluded accrual in antenuptial contracts, often to preserve separate estates.
Under the new system, a judge could, for instance, order that 30 % of the higher‑earning spouse’s estate (or specific property) go to the other spouse if it is fair to do so, even if their contract formally excluded accrual, provided the contributions were significant.
Other Important Legal Updates in 2024–2025
- Muslim marriages are now recognized under civil law, enabling those married under Islamic rites to access civil divorce, asset division, maintenance and custody — retroactively in many cases back to 2014. This follows the 2022 Constitutional Court ruling in Women’s Legal Centre Trust v President, and subsequent Divorce Amendment Act (2024).
- Customary marriages, under the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 1998, must generally default to in‑community property unless otherwise contracted—ensuring equitable asset sharing.
- Rule 43 and Rule 58 interim relief remain crucial: while proceedings continue, spouses can secure interim maintenance (support), custody, or legal cost help pending final divorce orders. Courts now place greater emphasis on full financial disclosure and child welfare.
Practical Implications for Couples
- Legal contracts excluding accrual no longer guarantee absolute separation at divorce or death. Even with a contract, spouses should expect that courts may adjust outcomes for fairness.
- Spouses married without accrual should recognize they now may have redistributive rights, especially where they contributed indirectly.
- Mediation will play a heightened role; early engagement with a Family Advocate can ease conflict, reduce cost, and speed resolution.
- Interim relief via Rule 43/58 can provide essential support before divorce finalizes—especially for children’s needs, legal fees, or maintenance.
What Couples Should Do Now
- Review your antenuptial or marriage contract with a family law attorney who understands the new rules and can assess risks.
- Gather evidence of contributions: emotional, household, childcare, business support—this builds the basis for redistribution.
- Plan early if considering ending the marriage: apply for Rule 43/58 relief as soon as needed.
- Consider mediation seriously—even if contested divorce is likely. Formal mediation is increasingly encouraged and carries weight in court.
- Update estate plans or wills, especially if married out of community property without accrual—since courts can affect distribution regardless of contract.
The 2025 divorce law reform in South Africa represents a landmark shift towards fairness, equality, and recognition of the varied forms of contribution within marriage. By empowering courts to look beyond formal contracts and ensure just outcomes—even in marriages that previously excluded accrual—the law acknowledges that contributions often come in non‑financial forms. These changes particularly protect homemakers, caregivers, and spouses who supported household and business success without enjoying formal ownership. Couples nearing separation, drafting antenuptial contracts, or planning estates should act now to understand how the new rules affect their rights and responsibilities.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: Can a contract excluding accrual still be fully enforced under the new law?
A1: Yes—unless enforcement would result in unfairness. Courts now have discretion to override strict contract terms for equitable redistribution.
NSFAS August 2025 Bursary Alert – New Eligibility Rules Could Disqualify Thousands of Students
Q2: Do the reforms apply retroactively to marriages before 1984?
A2: Yes—redistribution for pre‑1984 marriages is now affirmed for both divorce and inheritance situations.
Q3: Are Muslim marriages now treated the same as civil marriages in divorce law?
A3: Yes—Muslim marriages are now recognized under civil divorce law, allowing claims for maintenance, child custody, asset division, and forfeiture where applicable.
Q4: What is Rule 43, and how does it help during divorce proceedings?
A4: Rule 43 (High Court) and Rule 58 (Regional Court) enable interim orders such as maintenance, child custody, and legal fees before the final divorce decree is issued.
Q5: If I was a stay‑at‑home spouse contributing indirectly, can I now claim a share of assets?
A5: Yes. Courts may order redistribution if they determine those contributions enabled wealth creation—even if the marriage excluded accrual.
